Quote:
Originally Posted by Oshkey
Scott already posted dyno #'s.
|
Excuse me, but I thought Scott developed and is selling the product -- doesn't that make him an interested (as opposed to unbiased) party? I have no reason to doubt Scott's integrity, but as an example compare IPD's advertised numbers to the independent dyno numbers. And, didn't IPD have some early issues with collapsing hoses? Remember when IPD's
plenum was the "latest and greatest" with a thread a mile long? It is naive to think that all sellers' marketing claims are reliable -- some are (and, as a potential purchaser, I hope Scott's are) and some aren't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oshkey
I can never understand how people that want to sit on the fence expect others to do the dyno testing for them before they buy the product.
|
Huh? I think that's called prudence. Why risk wasting time and money on an unproven product? The only downside to waiting for all the facts to emerge is that if the product performs as advertised you are missing out on the increased performance and fun in the interim.
I'm with Morefun -- a potential purchaser of the Softronics
plenum/software, but waiting for corroboration of the marketing claims and field proven reliability before jumping in.