Hey Unregistered it seems that you haven't posted a message in our forums yet. Please join in on the fun and post a message! Click on Forum, then click the name of the appropriate forum such as "Cayman Chat" and then click the New Thread icon (looks like a Cayman door and side grill). Enter your message in the message editor and press submit and you are on your way!
Cayman Pictures & VideoThis forum is for Cayman owners to link in pictures of their Cayman from the Gallery. Please read the message on how to upload to the gallery and link in your photos. You may also link in YouTube and other video sources including videos in our Files section.
Your Donation Will Be Used To Pay For our ever increasing bandwidth costs, our hosting Service, domain registration, software licensing fees, maintenance costs and product evaluations Only!
Please enter your donation amount above, and then click on the donate button below.
0-60 did a feature on modifications for the Cayman S. They took one product from the some of the best companies and put them together. Its a pretty good article you should pick up the issue.
Ken you might want to change your opinion soon...
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Man S
You are kidding right? I picked up a copy of the magazine last October and thought it was pretty much garbage, so unless they've done a huge turn-around since then, or the issue I picked up just happened to be their worst ever, I wasn't impressed at all, in fact I thought parts were a joke from a journalistic standpoint. Conversely, copies of EVO that I've picked up have generally been good.
(pics of magazine)
They had a short review on the Techart GT street as well...
as well as a nice add
once again before people start yelling 321HP is with the APR catback exhaust and ECU. (BHP)
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Cayman GT
369BHP 325LBSTQ
313WHP 276WTRQ some people like the regular stock factory look, cool people modify the car.
Last edited by porsches4ed; 06-18-2008 at 02:26 PM.
From what I've seen from this magazine previously it is a joke. Not that it reflects poorly or well on your car but they are not known for editorial excellence. By the way do you have permission to post these supposedly copyrighted images here?
Ed I appreciate the info but as Santa Fe said, you need permission to post those items, let me know if you have it. Thanks!
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
K-Man S To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I am not sure if by "minus the good looks" they mean that the Cayman is not attractive? I certainly beg to differ. The looks, plus the mid-engine configuration are what sold me on the Cayman as opposed to the 911, which is what I had originally planned to get. That, and the diminutive size, making it more like the 356 and early 911s. A sports car ought to be small!
I am not sure if by "minus the good looks" they mean that the Cayman is not attractive? I certainly beg to differ. The looks, plus the mid-engine configuration are what sold me on the Cayman as opposed to the 911, which is what I had originally planned to get. That, and the diminutive size, making it more like the 356 and early 911s. A sports car ought to be small!